SYNGAS Refiner
Home Subscribe Advertising Events Consulting Publications Search Contact Us About Zeus
 

Conference Details
Introduction
Agenda
Objectives
Target Audience
Location / Hotel
Sponsorship Opportunities
Policies
Contact Us
 
 
Participating Companies
Air Liquide
Arizona Public Service
Battelle Energy Alliance
Bechtel
Burns & McDonnell
Casale Group
Chemtex International
Chevron ETC
Choren USA
Clean Wisconsin
ConocoPhillips
CRA International
Eastman Chemical Company
EPRI
Exponent
ExxonMobil
GE (China)
GE Energy
GreatPoint Energy
Great River Energy
Haldor Topsoe
JB Coal to Methane
JGC USA
Johnson Matthey Catalysts
KBR
KRI
LPP Combustion
Miller Consulting Services
MPR Associates
Mustang Engineering
Nerd Gas Company
NETL
Peabody Energy
Praxair
Purdue University
Rentech
Shaw, Stone & Webster
Shell
Siemens Power Generation
Strategic Change Management
Suncor Energy
Synthesis Energy Systems
TEXYN
TOTAL Gas & Power
Toyo USA
URS
US Department of Energy
Wyoming Gasification & Synfuels Company
XinAo Europe Limited
XinAo Group
 

Agenda

Thursday, April 10, 2008
8:00 - 8:30 AM Registration and Continental Breakfast
8:30 - 8:45 AM Alex Cornitius, news editor, SYNGAS Refiner
8:45 - 9:30 AM America's Future Fuel: Coal-Derived SNG or Foreign LNG Imports?
Fredrick D. Palmer, senior vice president, government relations, Peabody Energy
US natural gas end-users are betting on secure, domestic production of substitute natural gas (SNG) to meet future fuel and feedstock requirements because of mounting concern over projected LNG-import shortfalls and meeting future CO2 management regulations.
          Although several IGCC projects will eventually be built, US utilities and independent power producers will need SNG to meet future baseload power-generation requirements using clean, reliable and affordable pipeline-quality SNG.
          Petrochemical and fertilizer producers are determined to keep the US domestic industries competitive by using a steady supply of SNG at a fixed price. US industrial consumers will be able to use SNG in the existing natural-gas pipeline grid system.
Peabody Energy and ConocoPhillips (COP) are now hard at work developing a commercial SNG plant using E-Gas technology to produce 50 to 70 billion cubic feet per year of SNG from over 2.5 million tons per year of Kentucky coal. The plant's future production represents as much as 1.5 trillion cubic feet of SNG over the project's life. The $3 billion plant will create 175 jobs at the site and 375 coal-mining jobs. A 1,200-person peak-construction force will build the plant, resulting in a one-time, $229.1 million direct-economic impact.
          Palmer will discuss the importance of supplementing the US natural-gas supply with SNG and the project's feasibility study that examines development opportunities and reviews optimum project designs and specific sites. A detailed engineering and design study and a final investment decision will follow the study.
          The study will assess new design standards that meet or exceed environmental-protection regulations, including technology designed to lower the facility's carbon footprint. Peabody and COP are also working with the Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium and the Kentucky Geological Survey to examine carbon capture and storage options.
          The companies are pursuing the development of new, US coal-derived energy supplies to meet tomorrow's energy demand, requiring innovative ways to use existing resources that meet US needs today. Such efforts help strengthen energy security by increasing and diversifying supplies in an environmentally responsible manner.
9:30 - 10:15 AM Siemens Receives First US Gasifier Order from Secure Energy
Harry Morehead, manager, IGCC business development, Siemens Power Generation, Inc.
Interest in gasification continues to increase across the World as option for power generation and chemicals production. With the recent acquisition of the Siemens' SFG gasification technology, Siemens has developed the SFG-500 gasifier for IGCC and other gasification applications where a wide range of feedstock flexibility is needed.
          This presentation will first provide an update of Siemens gasification activities including a review of current projects in North American and China including the Secure Energy, Decatur, IL SNG Project. Siemens gasification technology will also be reviewed including development status and results from recent gasification tests.
10:15 - 10:45 AM Break
10:45 - 11:30 AM Increased US SNG Production Could Keep NatGas Prices Down
Harold "Skip" York, principal, chemicals & petroleum practice, CRA International
Importing cheap LNG in the US has been touted as a way to reduce pressure on domestic natural gas prices. However, near-term LNG capacity is unlikely to deliver sufficient volume to significantly reduce price. A number of constraints limiting LNG supply will remain for several years because there is little spare liquefaction capacity globally, contractual obligations, technical specifications of US infrastructure and the resistance by local population.
          Given ever-tightening emission and regulatory constraints, US power generators will continue to turn to natural-gas combined-cycle plants to meet future baseload requirements. This projected growth in power-generation demand combined with growing space heating requirements, the petrochemical industry need for competitive feedstocks, and the potential for natural gas to penetrate further in the transportation-fuel market will all contribute to significant growth in natural gas demand.
          This tight supply/demand balance in the US requires a price high enough to continue demand conservation. US gas market price of at least $6/MMBtu makes SNG and IGCC competitive at $3/MMBtu coal and cheaper petroleum-coke feedstock. US production of substitute natural gas (SNG) made from gasification plants fed by coal, petcoke or biomass could provide an additional economic supply source.
11:30 - 12:15 AM SNG Could Prevent a US Natural Gas Supply Shortfall
Chris Buehler, senior managing engineer, Exponent
The US natural gas market needs additional sources such as coal-derived substitute natural gas (SNG) to meet the expected shortfall and provide market stability. Domestic natural gas demand for electric power generation, petrochemical and fertilizer feedstocks, and industrial, commercial and residential heating is increasing while production remains relatively constant.
          The shortfall in US natural gas supply is expected to grow from 3.2 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) in 2006 to 4.1 Tcf in 2010 and 4.6 Tcf by 2015 while pipeline imported natural gas, predominantly from Canada, is expected to decline from 2.9 Tcf to 2.0 Tcf over this period. Five new liquefied natural gas (LNG) regasification facilities are currently under construction, but LNG may not be available because uncertainties in the global market remain. Competition for global LNG supplies is strong and the supplies available to the US may vary considerably from year to year.
          Increasing electric power demand and legislation limiting carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from electric power producers will only exacerbate a natural gas shortfall as new natural gas combined cycle rather than coal-based integrated gasification combined cycle plants are built to meet future baseload demand while emitting less CO2. Nuclear power generation is gaining traction with the first application to build and operate a new nuclear power plant in 30 years, but the review and approval process is expected to take almost five years and concerns regarding the waste remain.
          The technology to produce SNG from coal and petroleum coke is well established. The US has ample supplies of coal and is often referred to as the "Middle East" of coal. Prices of coal are even expected to decrease slightly between 2006 and 2015 while the CO2 generated during SNG production could be used for enhanced oil recovery. Clearly, coal-derived SNG presents an opportunity to alleviate a natural gas shortfall.
12:15 - 1:15 PM

Lunch

1:15 - 2:00 PM Technical Challenges and Solutions for SNG Production
Jim Jurczak, director of gasifcation projects and senior project manager in the energy global practice, Burns & McDonnell
Burns & McDonnell has been working with clients on a flexible alternative to a standard IGCC project, underlying operational flexibility to maximize revenue potential. Jim Jurczak, Director of Gasification projects for Burns & McDonnell, will discuss the technical challenges associated with SNG production and how Burns & McDonnell has worked to overcome these challenges. Challenges include making pipeline quality SNG, dealing with CO2 issues, requirements of higher purity oxygen than a traditional IGCC facility, and the challenges inherent with the shift reaction process.
To maximize flexibility in power block operations, the SNG plant will be able to turn down the SNG production as much as possible to be able to have a daily hot swing between power and SNG. Technical considerations include meeting pipeline-quality gas requirements, minimizing inerts in the syngas feed to the SNG unit, as well as optimizing the H2 / CO ratio and reactor temperatures. The design allows for maximum SNG turndown with water / steam side integration using steam from the shift reactor’s SNG process.
2:00 - 2:45 PM Convert Coal, Petcoke into Valuable SNG
Niels R. Udengaard, principal technology specialist, Haldor Topsoe Inc.
Rising natural gas prices have created a strong interest in producing substitute natural gas (SNG) from the cheaper and much more abundant coal and petroleum coke. Coal / petcoke gasification-based syngases is an essential step in SNG production. SNG process technologies and catalysts were developed and tested extensively during the 1970s until energy cost dropped substantially in the 1980s.
          A renewed interest today in basing more energy consumption on coal and petcoke has resulted in a revival of several older technologies that have been enhanced to improve efficiency and lower investment cost. Methanation is used as the final syngas-purification step in the production of ammonia, but methanation for SNG production is more complex involving much higher concentrations of CO and CO2. The high reaction heat results in large potential adiabatic temperature rises that may cause catalyst sintering and a possible potential for carbon formation.
          The methanation catalyst should be active and stable at both high and low temperatures for the methane-production processes because this is the key problem in optimizing the coal-based SNG methanation process. The optimal heat recovery of the reaction heat from the methanation reaction is also critical. The ability of the methanation catalyst to operate at high reactor exit temperatures allows for the production of valuable, superheated high-pressure steam.
          The Haldor Topsoe TREMP methanation process and catalysts is characterized by its simple layout, low investment cost, high efficiency, high SNG product quality, and export of high-pressure superheated steam. Power Holding's $1 billion, coal-to-SNG plant near Mount Vernon, IL in Jefferson County, which is scheduled to begin construction in 201008, will be using GE gasifiers and the TREMP methanation technology to convert over 4.0 million tons per year of coal into pipeline-quality SNG.
2:45 -3:15 PM

Break

3:15 - 4:00 PM Development of Enabling Technologies: SNG Production from Coal
Dr. Brian Turk, director, RTI International
US coal reserves represent a large energy resource that is virtually untapped, because of availability of oil and natural gas and the convenience associated with using these as both energy and raw chemical resources. The infrastructure already exists to effectively distribute these resources throughout the country. Furthermore, US industry already has and uses equipment and processes specifically designed for oil and natural gas as both an energy and raw chemical resource. Switching directly to coal will require dramatic changes in infrastructure and equipment within industrial plants. However, if a methane product meeting the specifications of pipeline natural gas can be effectively produced from coal, this methane product (SNG) can effectively utilize the existing infrastructure and operate existing industrial equipment without making large capital investments. In this scenario, the challenge becomes managing the cost and environmental performance of this coal conversion process. Further extrapolation of this idea allows leveraging this technology for coal to other energy resources, like petroleum coke and biomass.
          RTI International (RTI) is developing a number of enabling technologies for this conversion of coal into methane. Because gasification will be the primary conversion process, effective separation technologies will be critical for separating out the undesirable components. In field testing with actual coal-derived synthesis gas at Eastman Chemicals in Kingsport, TN, RTI has recently demonstrated many elements of its warm syngas cleaning technologies at the pilot plant-scale. RTI is also looking at technologies to effectively separate CO2, CO, and H2 for production of SNG meeting exiting pipeline specifications. RTI is also exploring novel gasification approaches and catalysts that target increased conversion to methane and/or process intensification. A summary of RTI's development of these enabling technologies will be presented.
4:00 - 4:45 PM Coal Derived Liquid Fuels Burn As Cleanly As Natural Gas
Leo Eskin, president and chief operating officer, LPP Combustion LLC
The LPP Combustion System converts alternative liquid fuels such as coal-derived liquids (Fischer-Tropsch liquids), petroleum based light distillate fuel oils (naphtha, kerosene, JP-8, diesel) and renewable fuels (biodiesel and ethanol) into a synthetic or substitute natural gas (SNG). This SNG (or LPP-Gas) can be burned with low emissions in virtually any combustion device in place of natural gas including gas turbines, boilers, industrial burners and process dryers.
          By combining LPP Technology with IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) and the CTL (coal-to-liquids) process, power generation and fuels production is made more flexible and the overall plant economics are improved. The capital cost of the plant can be reduced because a spare gasifier train is not be needed for coal gasification when the LPP Technology is used. This technology allows for separation of the ownership and operation of the CTL and power blocks. LPP Technology also has a synergistic relationship with IGCC technology by utilizing the waste nitrogen stream from the air separation unit of the coal gasification plant.
          During the production of liquid transportations fuels from coal using the Fischer-Tropsch process, a significant amount of byproduct naphtha is created. This byproduct naphtha can be as much as 25% to 40% of the total amount of coal-derived-liquids produced. This naphtha represents an opportunity fuel for use in gas turbines to generate steam and electricity using the LPP Combustion System. Coal-derived naphtha can meet the current California emission performance standard (EPS) of 1,100 lbs CO2/MWhr if CO2 is sequestered during the CTL process. Blending biofuels with coal-derived liquids can also reduce a coal-based facility's CO2 footprint.
          Utilities and power producers can use coal-based liquid fuels including naphtha and diesel to produce SNG for gas turbines while achieving emissions comparable to burning natural gas. Modification of the gas turbine combustion hardware is not required when using the LPP Technology. The LPP System provides a solution for utilizing US coal reserves to produce clean, reliable and cost effective electric power while reducing the US dependence on foreign energy sources.
4:45 - 5:00 PM Alex Cornitius, Zeus Development Corp.
5:00 - 6:00 PM Reception

Back to top


Copyright 1999-2007 Zeus Development Corp., All rights reserved.